Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
>since there's no decisive evidence that these two were indeed gay
""You can’t say for sure that the two were lovers. But considering their position, you can make that hypothesis. It is difficult to say with certainty.”"
>the headline literally is "

Embracing figures at Pompeii 'could have been gay lovers', after scan reveals they are both men"

>the person who made this assumption did so because it was convenient
An 18-yo roman dude and 20-yo roman dude (which are neither brothers nor father/son) were found in an embrace during an apocalypse scenario. Previously, it was believed they were women in an embrace.

To say the hypothesis only exists because it's convenient is to say that had one of these been a woman, nobody would have made the assumption they are lovers (based on their position). Because it isn't convenient.

How fucking stupid is that?

No Soup for you

Don't be the product, buy the product!

YES, I want to SOUP ●UP for ...